Letter: Prisoner tag delay
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter:
Prisoner tag delay
Sir: Any scheme of early release for prisoners runs risks, both political and otherwise. The very low failure rate of home detention curfew subject to electronic tagging, to which Angela Devlin draws attention ("Better to be a prisoner in your own home", 10 May), must be celebrated.
However, it is no secret that prison governors have been extremely cautious in their release decisions. The original projections were that between 3,000 and 4,000 prisoners would be released on curfew by Easter. In fact, last Friday there were fewer than 2,000 prisoners on the scheme.
The consequence is that the prison population continues to be held at a much higher level than is necessary to protect the public from serious harm. Indeed, there are in excess of 3,100 more people in prison today than the Home Office itself predicted just last October.
STEPHEN SHAW
Director, Prison Reform Trust
London EC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments