Letter: Portillo's record

Peter Tatchell
Sunday 07 November 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Portillo's record

Sir: The selection of a homophobic candidate like Michael Portillo to fight the Kensington and Chelsea by-election is the moral equivalent of choosing a racist. It shows that the Tory party remains as bigoted and intolerant as ever.

The Conservatives would not dare to select someone who advocates discrimination against black people. Why, then, are they standing a candidate who supports discrimination against lesbians and gay men? And why is there no great media and public outcry over this bare-faced opposition to gay human rights?

During his period as an MP, Mr Portillo voted in favour of Section 28, which has resulted in the censorship of gay issues in schools and the denial of support to vulnerable gay teenagers. He also voted against an equal age of consent, endorsing the criminalisation of 16 and 17-year- old gay men.

As Defence Secretary, Mr Portillo upheld the ban on homosexuals in the military.

If any candidate advocated similar discrimination against the black community they would be deemed unfit for public office.

PETER TATCHELL

Outrage!, London SW14

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in