Letter: Porn is no art
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I was astonished that The Independent chose to pass off as a serious article on the arts Laurence O'Toole's apologia for pornography and criticism of the Government's failure to remove all restrictions ("Time to shrug off the dirty mac", 12 June).
The fact that the laws of this country differ from those in other countries does not mean that they go against public opinion. I will take some convincing that the people of this country would be happy to see a career appearing in pornographic films presented to their children as if it were as morally neutral as teaching or nursing.
Nor do I believe relaxing restrictions on pornography would be an act of social liberalisation. Such a change would indicate that society considers the pornographer's right to make money by exploiting sex to be of greater importance than building a society based on mutual respect. A society in which people are "free" to do as they please in this context seems to mean a society where we don't care how others are exploited. Only the pornographer would be more free.
"Hardcore" pornography is not warm and cuddly; it is exploitative and degrading and those that make it are not artists.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments