Letter: Phone sweatshops
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Deborah Orr says BT will replace its call centre staffs with more machines ("Trouble at the 21st-century mills", 23 November).
Last month, to air a complaint, I dialled 150. After two tiers of button- pressing, I was told by a machine that they were so busy they wouldn't even put me in a queue: I should try later.
I did try later: same result. So I dialled the customer services manager, and a machine told me they couldn't answer.
I faxed the customer services manager. His reply advised me to ring 150. I wrote to BT's chief executive, Sir Peter Bonfield, and his assistant advised me to ring the customer services manager.
Is it more machines they need, or more people?
Professor GEORGE SOLT
Olney, Buckinghamshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments