Letter: Out of the air
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: Out of the air
Sir: One of the reasons given for the decision to privatise the National Air Traffic Services is that it is the only way to finance the necessary capital expenditure (perhaps pounds 1bn over the next few years) that Nats needs ("Safety fears over air traffic sell-off", 28 July).
This reason is specious. An analysis of the public finances to 2003/04, as contained in the March 1999 Treasury Red Book, suggests that the Treasury could easily finance pounds 1bn Nats capital expenditure without breaching the Treasury's own borrowing rules.
The Treasury operates two borrowing rules. It can only borrow to finance capital expenditure, and not current expenditure; and it seeks to ensure that net public sector debt at any time is below 40 per cent of GDP. Treasury figures show that in the five years to 2003/04 the Government could borrow an extra pounds 50bn without breaching those rules. The Treasury would only have to borrow half this additional amount to finance the Nats capital expenditure of pounds 1bn, together with the proposed PFI capital expenditure over the same period (around pounds 17bn) and the pounds 7bn public-private partnership proposed for the London Underground.
Thanks to the prudent stewardship of public finances by the Chancellor, the public sector has sufficient firepower to finance public sector capital projects in its own right - if it so wishes.
MAURICE FITZPATRICK
Head of Economics
Chantrey Vellacott DFK
London WC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments