Letter: Nuclear tragedy

S. Gratwick
Thursday 18 November 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: You report that Gerhard Schroder and the Greens are close to agreeing to shut down all 19 of Germany's nuclear power plants (report, 17 November). This is a tragedy for all of us.

One thing is certain; for the foreseeable future, they will be replaced by plant which burns fossil fuels and produces many tonnes of greenhouse gases. It is a tragedy brought about by the weakness of a politician trying to cling to office.

The Greens cannot have it both ways: until science and technology develop a practical third way of generating the amount of power which we use, and want to use, the only possibilities are fossil and nuclear. A choice has to be made.

Two points are put against nuclear: danger and cost. As to danger, we kill more than 3,000 people a year on the roads in the UK and injure many more - all for the convenience of having motor transport. What is the figure worldwide?

In all the 40 or more years that the world has had nuclear power, the number killed and injured is not a measurable fraction of that. All those were due to avoidable errors, not to any inherently insurmountable problems.

As to cost: what is the cost of nuclear power compared to the frightening cost of not stopping the growth in greenhouse gases?

S GRATWICK

Sevenoaks, Kent

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in