Letter: Nato's war on TV

Tim Gopsill,Barry White,Anne Kane
Sunday 25 April 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ireSir: We unreservedly condemn Nato's deliberate bombing of a working television and radio station in Belgrade on 23 April.

Nato has argued that previous civilian casualties were the result of accidental "collateral damage". In this case, however, Nato deliberately targeted civilian journalists and media workers by bombing a television station with staff present in the building. This means that Nato decided to treat media workers as "legitimate targets".

Moreover it did so having previously given a written commitment to the International Federation of Journalists that it would avoid civilian casualties, including journalists.

The federation was right to point out: "Killing journalists and media staff never wins wars or builds democracy, it only reinforces ignorance, censorship and fear. Nato's actions must severely compromise the fight for freedom of the press and freedom of expression, not just in Europe, but world-wide."

Irrespective of our own perceptions, there can be no doubt that not only the state media in Belgrade but virtually all of the opponents of the current regime there oppose Nato bombing. Such views cannot be suppressed by bombs.

The consequences of Nato's actions for freedom of speech and the lives of journalists and other media workers will be incalculable. By targeting Yugoslavia's media, because it does not like their coverage of this war, Nato has set a grave precedent.

TIM GOPSILL

BARRY WHITE

ANNE KANE

Campaign for media accuracy and free speech on war

London N1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in