Letter: Myth of the century
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In reply to Dr David Williams, I too have had enough - of the 2001- ers. They seem to think the millennium is real. Of course years (like days) are objective entities, but year numbers and dates are not.
The Western calendar is a mishmash of bodges and compromises. The day we call 1 January is a human invention, and wasn't in fact the start of the new year until the Gregorian calendar was adopted, in the 16th century over much of Europe but not until 1753 in England.
New Year celebrations are about the symbolism and magic of numbers, not about reality. Does Dr Williams watch in fascination as the car mileometer clicks over to 10001? The 2001 exponents are mathematically right, but have missed the point.
Dr SALLY WRAIGHT
Cambridge
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments