Letter: Mayoral manifesto

Michael Steed
Thursday 18 November 1999 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: So Ken Livingstone thinks he is setting the record straight about Neil Kinnock's claim that Livingstone's GLC drove away Labour voters ("Forget this `loony left' nonsense. When I ran the GLC, it worked and was popular", 17 November) by comparing voting in the 1983 general election with opinion poll figures from the following years.

He studiously avoids comparing real votes with real votes. At the next (1987) general election, it was only in London, along with the adjoining zone of the South-east, that there was an actual swing from Labour to Conservative. In consequence, Mr Kinnock had three fewer Labour MPs from London after 1987 than he'd had when he took over as leader, whilst gaining 23 more in the rest of Britain.

This may well have been more to do with the Lawson boom than with Mr Livingstone's popularity. But if he wants the record straight, he should check real votes (as opposed to hypothetical survey questions). This record is inconsistent with his own memory but quite consistent with Mr Kinnock's claim.

MICHAEL STEED

Department of Politics & International Relations

University of Kent at Canterbury

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in