Letter: Mayoral manifesto
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As a Labour Party member for over 30 years - I was one of the small group on the infamous Greater London Labour Party Executive in the late 1980s that organised against the left to remove the embarrassment that the London Labour Party was causing the leadership - I have found the shenanigans in recent months over the selection of a candidate for London mayor quite incredible.
Surely when the mayoral election takes place it will be based not on the 1997 general election manifesto but on a newly written manifesto which the successful mayoral candidate will play a leading role in defining. This manifesto will be of course subject to approval by the Labour Party before it becomes the document around which London Labour Party members will campaign.
It is therefore quite right that any mayoral candidate should and will be completely committed to that manifesto.
However, it is not surprising in the selection process that different candidates will put forward different views as to how key issues should be tackled - including London Underground financing.
I was interested to attend the Fabian Society fringe meeting at the Labour Party conference in Bournemouth to listen to how the three then-declared candidates - Ken Livingstone, Glenda Jackson and Trevor Phillips - answered the question on London Underground financing.
Glenda Jackson as the then-establishment candidate supported the government line while Trevor Phillips, who is now Frank Dobson's running mate, supported Ken Livingstone.
MIKE PARKER
Hexham, Northumberland
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments