Letter: Maternity takeover

Mrs Sandra Simkin
Wednesday 10 March 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I read with interest Jeremy Laurance's article "Surgeons still try to cover up errors" (5 March), especially the fact that 350 obstetricians face redundancy because there are too few consultant posts.

May I point out that the statutory duty for maternity care lies with midwives and not with obstetricians and the crisis surrounding maternity services does not lie with the excess supply of obstetricians but rather with the dearth of midwives.

Ever since the management of maternity services was grabbed by obstetricians/ gynaecologists there has been a falling off in the service to mothers and a massive increase in obstetric intervention. Recommended standards of care in labour depends on meeting a ratio of mothers to midwives of 35:1 and has nothing to do with the level of obstetricians employed.

The huge over-supply of gynaecologists/ obstetricians allows a caesarean section rate which is more than one third in excess of the World Health Organisation standard.

It is about time we stopped listening to the dire warnings of the BMA which is, after all, the lobbying body for doctors, and started listening to what women want from obstetric and gynaecological services.

Mrs SANDRA SIMKIN

Community Health Council Member

Woking,

Surrey

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in