Letter: Lords a-leaping

John Pratt
Wednesday 09 December 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In his deal with the Lords Tony Blair got the better of William Hague but it is by no means clear that he has brought the peers to heel. They have demonstrated that they are a law unto themselves. Lord Cranborne certainly believes that he has won a concession to the hereditary principle. At least they live to fight another day.

The Government that surprised us with this concession to hereditary right, however honourable its intent, may feel tempted to do another deal with the Lords when the Royal Commission has reported. Already we read that seats in the reformed chamber will be filled only in part by popular election. Who can doubt that the surviving hereditaries will put their weight behind such moves?

Tony Blair wants to convince us that he is sincere about the second stage of reform. William Hague says that he opposes stage one because he fears a house of cronies at stage two. Why not make the next concession one to what Mr Hague professes to want? Commit the Government now to a reformed second chamber that, because it should be conducting what Americans call "the people's business", will be fully elected and accountable to the people. There is no need to wait for the Royal Commission before deciding on this fundamental principle. No cronies. No hereditaries. No permanent elite.

JOHN PRATT

The Centre for Citizenship

London SE23

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in