Letter: Lessons of war
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In the war of words over the First World War the underlying moral issue, the problem of international terrorism, is easy to overlook.
Germany's original claim was that "no one had the right to stay the arm of Austria" in punishing the Serbian terrorism at Sarajevo. On this view, the right of victims to punish terrorists overrode the rights of national sovereignty. On the view of the British, who went to war in defence of Belgian sovereignty, these German claims destroyed the whole idea of sovereignty and of fidelity to treaties: not even for the punishment of terrorism should something so important be destroyed.
People on both sides believed that by defending their country they defended a principle of the highest moral importance. For this we should honour them all, British and German alike. They died in defence of conflicting moral principles which cannot both be right but which are both persuasive. The decision between the two principles was and is extremely difficult. People at once began to flinch from discussing it, lest each should see that the other side had a point. The discussion was displaced to general condemnation of British commercialism or German militarism.
But in recent years the original question has become lively again. President Reagan's address to terrorists - "You can run but you can't hide" - gave the German moral position of 1914 a new lease of life.
MARTIN HUGHES
Department of Philosophy
University of Durham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments