Letter: Kosovo stalemate
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I agree that the only solution to stop the killing of civilians in Kosovo is for "negotiations to be forced by a stalemate" (leading article, 20 January).
However, your idea of a stalemate being imposed by ground troops "securing the separation of combatants" is unlikely to materialise ; in both Bosnia and Iraq, no country was willing to contribute such troops.
A stalemate in Kosovo may instead be achieved by balancing the military forces of the combatants. This can be done by pursuing a "degrade and diminish" policy similar to the one applied against Iraq last month.
An unrelenting campaign, via Western air power, against the Serbs' military machine, ammunition depots and weapons industry can degrade Milosevic's capacity for razing villages and perpetrating further massacres.
Dr SALAH EZZ
Cairo
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments