Letter: Judge BAA on its past record

David Rich
Saturday 08 October 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MICHAEL Maine asks why people in West London refuse to accept BAA's promise that it has no wish to build an additional runway at Heathrow. Perhaps part of the answer is in the second half of his letter where he tries to convince readers that BAA wants to build a fifth terminal not because it is in the interests of shareholders but because it is in the interests of the country. What nonsense] BAA is a public limited company with a primary duty to shareholders. Any claim that it is working solely in the national interest raises doubts about its integrity.

David Rich

Colnbrook, Berkshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in