Letter: Jenkins report
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Perhaps someone who has read Lord Jenkins' proposals for electoral reform can explain in simple terms why there is a need for separate candidates (from party lists!) for the top-up seats.
Why not make the top-up seat go to the candidate from the constituency elections who scored the most votes for that party while failing to be elected? Indeed, since the top-up seats are, in the main, going to reflect the breakdown of votes among the grouped constituencies, why is it needed at all? Could not a simple adding of the votes across all the constituencies produce pretty well the same result?
RICHARD BARTLE
West Bergholt, Essex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments