Letter: Isolating GM crops

Christopher Padley
Tuesday 01 June 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Guy Charter asks how GM crops can be isolated adequately when they can be pollinated by bees (letter, 28 May). I asked this very question of an information officer of the Health and Safety Executive and she told me that the existing regulations were not expected, and never intended, to prevent all cross-pollination, which was not possible. They are intended only to "minimise" cross-pollination.

To me, this seemed very much like imposing a regulation of "not many naked lights" in the presence of inflammable gases.

Even if Guy Charter were able to persuade his bees to refrain from cross- pollinating GM and non-GM crops, can we really believe that wind pollination only takes place over a few yards?

In practice, most pollen will only travel a very short distance, but the occasional wind eddy is bound to lift some pollen clear of the ground, from where it may travel on the winds for any distance: after all, sand from the Sahara occasionally causes coloured rain in England. It seems that the regulations are only intended to reduce cross-pollination to the level where it does not interfere with the trials themselves. They do not, and cannot, prevent escape of GM genetic material into the wild.

CHRISTOPHER PADLEY

Louth and District Green Party

Market Rasen

Lincolnshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in