Letter: Internet liberty
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Like other censors, John Carr of the Internet Watch Foundation (Right of Reply, 7 September) sees problems where there are none.
There is no demand by Internet users for net regulation. The demand for regulation comes from government, and from all those who have an innate suspicion of what Mr Carr calls "mass media".
I suspect that Mr Carr distrusts the "mass" (including you and me) more than he distrusts the media. But the mass nature of the Internet is a source of great optimism - the prospect of liberating ordinary people from the constraints that have always been imposed upon communication.
Of course, there will be a few idiots who will abuse the system. Such people cause no physical harm to anyone. Their liberty is the price we pay for our freedom.
MARK PAWELEK
Belvedere, Kent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments