Letter: Ingres' camera?

Nicholas Williams
Monday 28 June 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: David Hockney helps to refocus attention on drawing but I feel he misses a crucial point ("Did Ingres use a camera?", 25 June).

Perhaps Ingres did use a drawing aid; so too, it has been suggested, may have Holbein. There is no reason to suppose that either artist would not have been capable of producing such exquisite drawings without mechanical help. It is only at the end of the20th century that it seems improbable that such drawings could be made from direct observation. Photography has helped to bring about his decline.

Photography as a reference source can be a valuable tool in the hands of artists who completely reinvent the imagery, but for a representational artists it is destructive to the learning curve. Any sincere representational artist would admit that working with mechanical devices or photography is the easier option. When working from photographs the artist is already presented with a two-dimensional form and many aspects of image-making have already been solved.

It is during the processes of dissecting and recording a three-dimensional image and translating it into two dimensions that the individual stamp of an artist emerges. It seems likely that through this strict practice (and his talent), Ingres was able to produce such a high level of draughtsmanship. More and more, contemporary artists are using artificial methods as aids, and good drawing is truly rare.

NICHOLAS WILLIAMS

Newquay, Cornwall

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in