Letter: Immigrant votes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Kathy Marks claims that expatriate British citizens living in Australia are only allowed to vote in the coming referendum "because of a legal anomaly" ("'pounds 10 Poms' still clinging to the mother country", 4 November).
But how anomalous is it? All Australian citizens living in the United Kingdom are automatically eligible to be on the voters' roll here as citizens of a Commonwealth country. That's why the current possibility of excluding Pakistan from the Commonwealth would also disenfranchise those Pakistani citizens who rightly form such an important part of the electorate in many British cities.
The fact that Commonwealth immigrants have been given full political rights has been an important factor in helping good community relations in Britain. Certainly for us the continuation of such an inclusive policy is not just a "legal anomaly".
ROBERT BELL
London NW8
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments