Letter: How to share power
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your account of the d'Hondt procedure used to allocate ministerial portfolios on the Northern Ireland Executive includes several inaccuracies ("Sharing of seats devised in 18th century", 30 November).
Viktor d'Hondt was indeed a Belgian, but could not have been "an 18th- century Belgian political scientist", because Belgium did not exist before 1830. He was a 19th-century lawyer who independently developed his system of proportional representation, which had been pioneered by the American Thomas Jefferson.
The d'Hondt procedure, using the divisors 1, 2, 3, 4 ... n, may be seen as a series of rounds. In each round, one portfolio is allocated to the highest-scoring party. In the first round each party's score is the number of seats it holds in the elected assembly. After the first portfolio is allocated to the winning party, that party's score in the next round is divided by two; the other parties' scores are unaltered, and the party now having the highest score wins a portfolio. When any party wins its second portfolio, its score for the next round is its original seat total divided by three, and so on. The process continues until all portfolios, 10 in the case of Northern Ireland, have been allocated.
Mysterious and unelaborated references were also made in The Independent's article to "the first-preference votes" coming into play. They did so in the allocation of the eighth ministerial portfolio. In this round the Ulster Unionist Party had a score of 9 (27 seats divided by 3), and so did Sinn Fein (18 seats divided by 2). As a tie-breaker the rule used is that the portfolio goes to the party with the highest number of first- preference votes gained in the assembly election - in this case the tie- breaker worked in favour of the UUP.
BRENDAN O'LEARY
Professor of Political Science
London School of Economics
London WC2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments