Letter: GM food furore

Dr K. N. Chandler
Wednesday 17 February 1999 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: GM plants tolerant to herbicides will, presumably, contain herbicide residues. The "precautionary principle" requires that we assume these residues may harm us when we eat them, unless and until they are proved safe.

The Salk vaccine has done a magnificent job over the past 40 years in saving many from polio: it is only now that it has been found that it may have caused cancers.

That was a very worthwhile benefit and arguably justifies its use despite this new-found side effect. The only benefit from herbicide-tolerant GM foods is to make some rich people richer.

Dr K N CHANDLER

Swansea

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in