Letter: Global warming
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The debts that the wealthy countries have recently forgiven their poorer neighbours are as nothing in comparison with the amount they owe the rest of the world for the increased storm damage they have caused due to global warming. While debts worth roughly $3bn have just been conditionally written off by the UK, the cost of the damage done by the recent floods in Venezuela alone has been put at $10bn.
Fifty-six countries were affected by severe floods and at least 45 by drought during 1998. The rate of destruction will accelerate because greenhouse gases are still being added to the atmosphere at perhaps five times the rate that natural systems can remove them.
Michael Meacher, the UK Environment Minister, recently told the Royal Geological Society: "The future of our planet, our civilisation and our survival as a human species ... may well depend on [our responding to the climate crisis by] fusing the disciplines of politics and science within a single coherent system."
"Contraction and convergence" is such a system. Global greenhouse emissions need to be reduced by at least 60 per cent in less than a hundred years. When governments agree to be bound by such a target, the diminishing amount of carbon dioxide and the other greenhouse gases that the world could release while staying within the target can be calculated for each year in the coming century. This is the contraction part of the process.
The convergence part means that each year's tranche of this global emissions budget gets shared out among the nations of the world in a way which ensures that every country converges on the same allocation per inhabitant by, say, 2030. Countries unable to manage within their allocations would, within limits, be able to buy the unused parts of the allocations of other, more frugal, countries.
Sales of unused allocations would give the countries of the South the income to purchase or develop zero-emission ways of meeting their needs. The countries of the North would benefit from the export markets this restructuring would create.
AUBREY MEYER
Global Commons Institute
http://www.gci.org.uk
RICHARD DOUTHWAITE
MAYER HILLMAN
Senior Fellow Emeritus, Policy Studies Institute
DAVID CHAYTOR MP
(Bury North, Lab)
Chair, GLOBE UK All-Party Group
TOM SPENCER
Secretary General, GLOBE Council
ANDREW SIMMS
Global Economy Programme, New Economics Foundation
London NW2
Fifty-six countries were affected by severe floods and at least 45 by drought during 1998. The rate of destruction will accelerate because greenhouse gases are still being added to the atmosphere at perhaps five times the rate that natural systems can remove them.
Michael Meacher, the UK Environment Minister, recently told the Royal Geological Society: "The future of our planet, our civilisation and our survival as a human species ... may well depend on [our responding to the climate crisis by] fusing the disciplines of politics and science within a single coherent system."
"Contraction and convergence" is such a system. Global greenhouse emissions need to be reduced by at least 60 per cent in less than a hundred years. When governments agree to be bound by such a target, the diminishing amount of carbon dioxide and the other greenhouse gases that the world could release while staying within the target can be calculated for each year in the coming century. This is the contraction part of the process.
The convergence part means that each year's tranche of this global emissions budget gets shared out among the nations of the world in a way which ensures that every country converges on the same allocation per inhabitant by, say, 2030. Countries unable to manage within their allocations would, within limits, be able to buy the unused parts of the allocations of other, more frugal, countries.
Sales of unused allocations would give the countries of the South the income to purchase or develop zero-emission ways of meeting their needs. The countries of the North would benefit from the export markets this restructuring would create.
AUBREY MEYER
Global Commons Institute
http://www.gci.org.uk
RICHARD DOUTHWAITE
MAYER HILLMAN
Senior Fellow Emeritus, Policy Studies Institute
DAVID CHAYTOR MP
(Bury North, Lab)
Chair, GLOBE UK All-Party Group
TOM SPENCER
Secretary General, GLOBE Council
ANDREW SIMMS
Global Economy Programme, New Economics Foundation
London NW2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments