Letter: German invasion

Peter Gardner
Tuesday 22 December 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I am very surprised at Ken Livingstone's claim that Oskar Lafontaine has made no proposal for tax "harmonisation" in the EU ("Charm is not enough - now Blair must take on Murdoch", 17 December). I believe he has quite clearly expressed these sentiments and Gerhard Schroder has stated that it is also German government policy.

Mr Livingstone also lauded the creation of a European currency bloc large enough to resist the attacks of speculators which have in the past sabotaged the plans of Labour governments. How much policy latitude does Mr Livingstone imagine future Labour governments would have when monetary policy, fiscal policy, employment policy, and social policy are determined by the EU?

A "government" in such circumstances would not be a real government at all and would have no chance of carrying through policies, whether of the right or left, old Labour or new Labour, against the power of the real government in Brussels, Frankfurt, and Berlin.

Lastly, when Mr Livingstone predicts a flood of jobs from Britain if we do not join EMU I must ask why it is that overseas investments in the UK rose by 38 per cent in 1997. Does this suggest that the UK is becoming unattractive as a place for investment because of its decision not, so far, to enter EMU? I think not.

PETER GARDNER

Oxford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in