Letter: Genes and food

Tony Juniper
Friday 14 August 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Richard Dawkins blames the media for "whipping up ignorant hysteria" over genetically engineered foods. But the fact remains that genetic engineering poses potential threats that have yet to be fully explored.

For example, it is now known that non-plant genes that confer pesticide resistance in crop plants can escape into wild weeds, making them resistant too. What could be the environmental impact of a chemical and genetic "arms race" to control such superweeds? What will be the effects on wildlife?

What will be the findings of independent state-funded research into the risks of eating certain genetically-modified foods? Most of this research will not be completed until 2001.

The rush of genetic foods towards our shops and stomachs has little to do with solving pressing environmental and social issues and everything to do with the biotech firms raking in a return on multi-billion-dollar investments. Professor Dawkins may know all about the selfish gene, but he seems sadly ignorant about the selfish shareholder.

The only sensible course, proposed by Friends of the Earth and by the Government's own wildlife advisers, English Nature, is to impose a five- year moratorium on commercial development of these crops so that proper research may be completed.

TONY JUNIPER

Policy and Campaigns Director

Friends of the Earth

London N1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in