Letter: For the prosecution
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is paradoxical that Crown Prosecution Service proposals strengthening the rights of vulnerable victims are challenged by Liberty ("Civil rights fears over CPS reform", 9 August).
From research for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, about victims with learning disabilities, I criticised CPS practice, particularly concerning non-prosecution of so-called "minor" offences. Significant improvements have since been made. But the CPS can still, in effect, act as judge and jury and block cases because of a "low likelihood of conviction".
This often stems from a false belief that people with mental disabilities are poor witnesses. The new CPS proposals could overcome this final hurdle, and should be welcomed.
Dr CHRIS WILLLIAMS
Institute of Education
University of London
London W1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments