Letter: Flexible grammar

R. L. Sturch
Sunday 15 August 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Professor Leech is wrong to be "philosophical" about changes to English ("We're gonna havta go with the flow - official", 13 August). Many are no doubt harmless or indeed beneficial. But some, like the obliteration of the distinctions between "can" and "may" or "will" and "shall", actually impoverish the language.

People will be unable to say things they might quite well want to say. And if schools abandon teaching such differences, children will not understand what they read unless they limit their reading to texts from the last 30 years (and only the more carelessly written of those).

R L STURCH

Kidlington, Oxfordshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in