Letter: Fish, farms and food
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: Fish, farms and food
Sir: Natasha Walter ("In the fields of conflict", 2 August) fashionably demonises genetic modification by linking it inextricably with Monsanto and other "big business". This association, now firmly implanted in public consciousness, has sadly clouded much of the debate about this new technology.
But "big business" is not the only framework for such research. Around the world, including the developing world, a number of not-for-profit agricultural institutes are endeavouring to improve yields of a wide range of crops, both cash and subsistence. Genetic modification is one approach being tested.
Are Greenpeace going to tear down fields of experimental sorghum in West Africa? Or is it a case of we (first world) don't want it, but you (third world) can make do with it?
Genetic modification offers the prospect of incredible benefits worldwide - regardless of the agency that develops it - to both industrialised agriculture, and developing-world subsistence farming. As with any new technology, tests are needed, and the nature of genetic modification requires that these be especially stringent. We need to advance carefully, but advance we must.
NICK ALLEN
Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments