Letter: Films vs movies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Tony Atkinson (letter, 21 May) argues that "movies" such as the Star Wars series are made to entertain while "films" are intellectual fodder for small audiences of snobs. This argument would make sense if the audiences for films had the opportunity to make the distinction for themselves by a fairer and broader distribution of films. The present American distribution monopoly ensures that we are given a diet of filmburgers.
In terms of "action" films Kurosawa's Seven Samurai contains more skill than anything put into the current American "action" movie, but the popular audience has had no exposure to anything but the filmburger.
The "snobs" don't deride entertainment, they just want it with a bit more intelligence and wit than is evident in the average American "action" burger, which seems to be based on the cattle prod or the computer game.
TERRY LAING
Norton, Teesside
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments