Letter: Female role

Michael McIldowie
Tuesday 16 March 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Reading your "Accidental Heroes" column on 13 March, I was intrigued to learn that Tony Warren had chosen an actor to play the manifestly feminine role of Ena Sharples in Coronation Street. Back to Shakespeare, or at least "Old Mother Riley", I thought. Not a bit of it! This so-called actor was in fact an actress, the "formidable Violet Carson".

What conceivable utility is there in describing an actress as an actor? The former term is time-honoured, dating back at least to the end of the 17th century, and is one of the rare instances in English where we can indicate both gender and profession in a single word.

No Frenchwoman would be ashamed to describe herself as "une boulangere", nor a Spaniard as "una profesora". Indeed, the French are pushing ahead with greater "feminisation" of their nouns - "madame la ministre" alongside "monsieur le ministre", and "une deputee" as opposed to "un depute". Why are our female thespians so coy?

The object of language is to convey meaning, not to cloud it - which is what giving a unisex meaning to "actor" does. Can anyone justify this bizarre development?

MICHAEL McILDOWIE

Teddington, Middlesex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in