Letter: Defensive medicine
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Marina Cantacuzino's article, "Birth pains which end in tragedy" (9 November) keenly illustrates the problems generated by our system of compensation for medical negligence.
Although the NHS complaints procedure is designed to give patients maximum information, the tendency of clinicians to go into "defence mode" is understandable. Admissions of culpability leave oneself open to professional censure (as witnessed in the case of the Bristol cardiac surgeons) and litigation.
Contrary to popular belief, as well as that of many solicitors, NHS trusts are not insured against medical negligence claims and it is they who foot the bill. Couple this with the fallibility of the medical profession, the impossibility of predicting and preventing many of the adverse consequences of childbirth and a system of health care provision predicated on a localised budget (NHS trusts), and is it any wonder that doctors are reluctant to own up and say sorry?
If the NHS really wants a method of telling patients the truth when things go wrong, the system of compensation for victims of medical accidents and negligence must be centralised. This would also reduce the suffering of those who have to pursue an adversarial course for years before receiving justice and fairly compensate those whose children, for example, are damaged by a medical accident and are currently entitled to very little.
Mr L J ROBERTS MRCOG
Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist
Winterton, Lincolnshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments