Letter: Council secrecy

Councillor Margaret Little
Thursday 04 March 1999 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Letter:

Council secrecy

Sir: While the move to weed out corrupt councils is welcome (report, 1 March), you barely touch on the frightening threat to democracy in Labour's recent White Paper which seeks to "modernise" local government.

Local authorities are required to change their decision-making processes in a way that concentrates power in the hands of a few - or even one.

In the most-favoured version, a leader with a "cabinet" of senior councillors will act as the executive. All other councillors, will have to be content with a "scrutiny" role. All committees (except for those with a statutory basis like Licensing and Planning) will be abolished.

The press and public, who now are able to be present at committee meetings and to see reports, will no longer know for certain how the "cabinet" reaches its conclusions. They and the remaining elected councillors will have to be content with hand-outs. Only at (whipped) council meetings will all councillors be able to vote.

The Government's two alternative versions are an elected mayor, similar to the one proposed for Greater London, with a chosen "cabinet", or a mayor alone, relying entirely on paid officials. Implementing the two "mayor" versions needs primary legislation, but some councils are already piloting the "leader and cabinet" version. In Hammersmith one councillor comments: "Ninety per cent of what was public a year ago is now secret."

Councillor MARGARET LITTLE

Liberal Democrat Group

London Borough of Camden

London WC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in