Letter: Costs of the PFI
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The former chief executive of Oxford's Radcliffe Infirmary deplores the greater cost of borrowing money for building new hospitals when private sector companies, rather than the Government, are the borrowers (letter, 19 July).
This is not the only drawback of the Private Finance Initiative. The companies who build and run a hospital on behalf of the NHS are obliged to make the profits of shareholders their priority. This demands a rapid turnover of patients.
It is difficult to see how this can be reconciled with the medical teaching and research for which Oxford is internationally renowned. A business strategy which depends on "fast throughout" should not be allowed to dictate the length of patients' stay, particularly when this is linked to the training role of university hospitals
Dr M I HEATLEY
Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments