Letter: Child prisoners

Paul Cavadino
Friday 15 January 1999 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Child prisoners

Sir: The level of disruption by children at the Medway secure training centre and the excessive force used by staff to restrain them ("Use of necklocks on child prisoners broke the rules", 15 January) is particularly striking for two reasons. Firstly, most of the trainees have not been sentenced for violent offences. Their most common offences are taking cars, burglary, criminal damage and theft. Secondly, local authority secure units already hold many individual children who are just as difficult as Medway's trainees, but they are not plagued by the problems which have arisen from placing so many repeat offenders together in one place.

It is significant that the plans the Government recently announced to tackle Medway's problems involved transferring some of the centre's trainees to local authority secure accommodation, which can provide much better care and control. This underlines the case for halting plans to build more secure training centres.

If the same resources were spent on more local authority secure places and intensive supervision programmes, this would do much more to reduce juvenile crime than replicating this failing experiment.

PAUL CAVADINO

National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders

London SW9

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in