Letter: Charles's GM stand

Evelyn Armistead
Sunday 06 June 1999 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: By identifying the advisors to Prince Charles ("Why Prince went tabloid on GM food", 2 June) you begin to expose the anti-democratic nature of the campaign against GM food.

I have watched with alarm as a small group of highly-interconnected people in environmental groups, charities, commerce and the media co-ordinate the use of their position or profession to further their own opinions. Worse still, their relentless coercion has made it difficult for other organisations to take an independent view for fear of obloquy.

It is the cruellest irony that the Government is now accused of news management when this is what the campaign against GM food has been all about.

MARK FISHER

Shipley, West Yorkshire

Sir: Anne McElvoy is an ornament to The Independent. But surely she is guilty of wilder mis-statement than those she targets in her "A Right royal rant that gives us some modified food for thought" (Review, 2 June) when she describes the Prince of Wales as "a product of centuries of genetic modification". Genetic "selection", yes.

Actually, HRH often has an uncanny sense (maybe inherited down the centuries) of what a lot of people are quietly thinking. Multinational companies damage developing countries.

EVELYN ARMISTEAD

Presteigne,

Powys

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in