Letter: Caging Saddam
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The cat-and-mouse tactics of Saddam Hussein with the UN weapons inspection teams has led, seemingly inevitably, to the recent air attacks. But would it not have been a far better policy to have left Iraq free of sanctions and inspections and to have set up a defence pact with Saudi- Arabia and the Gulf States so that any attack upon any of them by Iraq would have called forth a united response?
The Iraqi people would have been spared much hardship and the opposition forces within Iraq could have been more effective. As it is the Iraqis have suffered from the West and have been encouraged to rally round the despot. The possibility of a policy of rapprochement with Iraq's neighbours and the Muslim world has been lost.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments