Letter: Brush with death?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Brush with death?
Sir: I suppose Tom Lubbock's writing must be good journalism because he provokes such anger in me ("Is the writing on the wall?", 11 May). Whether it is good "art" criticism is quite another matter.
"Painting is dead" is as nonsensical and pointless a statement as "history is dead".
People die or can be living dead in the creative sense, but paint in its various forms has been around since the beginning of recorded history and will continue to be around whilst humanity is around - it's an essential tool of human expression, exploration and creativity.
Painters paint. "Art" critics write words, words which judge, distort and pervert the painter's work, constructing a mythological art world of heroes and isms. "Artists" with fragile talents and little to say are set up like kings for a day then dropped when eventually "found out". The "art" business is sick and may well in its current manifestation deservedly die.
Reynolds pointed out in the 18th century that much of the art produced in his age or in any age was mediocre, derivative and lacking in originality. Much art today lacks any pretence of skill and talent and is worst of all, boring.
But then, as Tom Lubbock grudgingly recognises, there are individual artists who transcend this cesspit, look straight ahead and really have something individual and meaningful to say. Thus it is and always will be.
I suppose there will also always be a critic desperate for something to say to make a buck who will ask whether painting is once again dead.
ROGER HOLLOWAY
Lampeter, Dyfed
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments