Letter: Bordeaux `plonk'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your feature on claret ("Claret, favourite tipple of Britain's drinking class, condemned as plonk", 1 September) is confused.
You state that claret is "tough when young" - yet most of the wines rejected in the Which? test are less than four years old. Of course they will not seem attractive when compared with early maturing styles from the New World.
Similarly, Anthony Rose is wrong to assert that the "New World beats Bordeaux at its own game". It is playing a very different game indeed. No claret drinker would regard "intense fruit flavours" as a priority; rather, one looks for the subtlety and complexity that the climate and terroir of Bordeaux often provide.
There is plenty of good value claret available from competent petits chateaux. At the same time, there is plenty of poor, additive-rich wine emerging from Australia.
PETER BRENNAN
Enfield, Middlesex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments