Letter: Boeing workhorse
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: With every sympathy for the families of those lost in the Egyptair crash, I am compelled to say that your article "Chequered history of the 767" (1 November) is a little unfair if it reflects the history of the aircraft since 1982.
I have no interest in the Boeing company, but I have travelled around the world for 50 years on varied aircraft, including many hours on the Boeing 767. You quote three instances in stating that the "plane's record has not been unblemished".
One was the hijacking of the Air Ethiopia aircraft, with the hijackers refusing to allow the crew to land to refuel. You cannot really blame the crew or the aircraft for this. Another was an emergency landing at Heathrow.
The history of an aircraft with more than 3 million flights and some 813 million passengers need not necessarily be seen as "blemished" over the 17 years that the 767 has been operational.
R CHRISTOFFERSEN
Ullapool, Highland
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments