Letter: Bleeding the NHS
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: With traditional Tory ignorance of business economics, Ann Widdecombe told the party conference that "Every time you supply your own health, you are freeing up the NHS to look after someone else's health."
This cracker-barrel analysis typically discounts the cost of training, something which private medicine simply cannot afford. Instead, the private sector allows the taxpayer to pay for training staff then simply poaches them from the NHS at a fraction of the real cost, creating the current shortages in the NHS and huge profits for itself. In effect "supplying your own health" through the private sector means subsidising an industry which is bleeding the NHS to death. As usual, the taxpayer is subsidising an ostensibly "private" industry.
The plain fact is that if a training levy were imposed upon the health industry it would shrivel back to Harley Street, licking its wounds. Additionally, the NHS would have no problems paying its staff a living wage. As it is, private medicine is a parasite on the NHS and the state. But how can we expect a Tory to recognise a parasite, especially one making money at the expense of what Miss Widdecombe still quaintly calls "the poor"?
ROB KENYON
London SE14
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments