Letter: Behind the patches
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You report ("Call for nicotine patches on NHS", 10 June) that Dr Ian Gibson MP is outraged at my revelation that the recent nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) press conference at the House of Commons was funded by a commercial company. He said my observations were "100 per cent" false.
The facts are that the invitations to the event were sent out by a medical PR company, the report by eminent scientists was fully funded by a pharmaceutical company, and the company and others would benefit if NRT patches or treatment were placed under prescription.
There was a clear, undisclosed commercial background to a meeting purporting to be concerned only about public policy. I wonder what Dr Gibson's reaction would have been if I had hosted such a meeting in the Commons secretly promoted by a tobacco company standing to gain hugely from a change in public policy.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments