Letter: BBC's digital fee

Hugh Sheppard
Friday 06 August 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: "Never mind the quality, feel the width" was a BBC catch- phrase - and with respect to digital broadcasting, it still is.

When sports contracts are lost, we are told that higher prices are a fact of life and it would be irresponsible of the BBC to pay what the market demands. No appeal was made for an increase in the licence fee on those grounds.

With digital there is no such inhibition. The BBC's revenue is already enormous, yet it still asks for more, mainly to fund the costs of spreading itself, like an oil slick, into every bay and inlet. At the same time, BBC programme-making facilities and associated staff are hived off into BBC Resources, a subsidiary company which is likely to be privatised.

At a time when every commercial cable and satellite broadcaster recognises it can only build audiences by taking viewers away from the free-to-air channels, how is it that the BBC has failed so lamentably to concentrate on its core services?

Two pre-eminent domestic channels and a global news channel of substance would surely sustain the BBC's reputation and be seen as essential components of every digital package.

The BBC's bath-water is now so murky that Greg Dyke, the new Director General, is unlikely to know for some time what is in it. If the baby is still there, it has certainly stopped waving.

HUGH SHEPPARD

Hook, Hampshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in