Letter: Battle of the Mall

Tony Tapley
Monday 07 September 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Letter:

Battle of the Mall

Sir: I am embarrassed to be associated with the cant of Trevor Roberts (letter, 4 September), being a member of the Royal Town Planning Institute, over which he presides.

The planning permission for the soon-to-open centre at Trafford was not issued glibly nor without lengthy and rigorous consideration of the likely traffic and town-centre impact. Throughout the 13 years of planning this scheme, objectors, such as Mr Roberts, have had full opportunity to present all the evidence to support their case. This evidence was scrutinised by the best available independent planning inspectors and the decision was tested through legal challenge by the objectors right through to the House of Lords.

There is massive support and mounting excitement amongst those without vested interests in the North-west, about the opening of a world-leading urban regeneration project, which has cost the public purse nothing. People like their leisure and shopping. It does not come any better than this. Why should this job-creating redevelopment of derelict land still be questioned by objectors who have had more than enough opportunity to have their say?

TONY TAPLEY

Partner, Head of Planning

Rapleys, Commercial Property and Planning Consultants

London W1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in