Letter: Barristers' fees
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You report (11 August) an allegation that barristers sometimes overcharge. That, if true, is not astonishing. A barrister whose client is on legal aid is subject to the same temptations as a garage mechanic whose customer is covered by insurance.
However, an insurance company which persistently allowed mechanics to claim higher hourly rates than other insurance companies would lose business because its premiums would be higher. Legal aid is a sort of insurance against the need to defend ourselves against unjust accusation. Unlike private insurance it is a state monopoly. Parliament, though it devolves the details to government, is therefore responsible for setting legal aid barristers' hourly rates.
In a serious criminal prosecution the judge is also paid at a rate determined by Parliament. His or her salary is that of a civil servant running a large government department. Counsel for the defence often receives more public money than the judge. We know this because successful legal aid barristers decline judicial appointments. The current level of legal aid fees therefore has worse consequences than the cost to the taxpayer: Competent lawyers do not become judges and it is hard for those who are seen to be less competent, since they are appointed as judges, to gain respect in court.
Let Parliament decree that no lawyer in a case shall be paid from public funds at a higher hourly rate than the judge. That would be a clear rule that everybody could understand; it would give us better judges and it would save public money.
PHILIP E ROE
St Albans, Hertfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments