Letter: Bail conditions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You report on Dr Mandeep Dhami's address to the British Psychological Society under the headline "JPs inconsistent on bail decisions" (17 December). I was one of the magistrates who participated in Dr Dhami's survey. I do not consider Dr Dhami's conclusions fair, for the following reasons.
Lay magistrates sit in threes and not as individuals; decisions are therefore based on a consensus of views after all the circumstances have been heard, before it is decided whether or not to grant bail.
There are clear, strict guidelines on the granting or refusal of bail, particularly when bail is refused. Also, when conditional bail is granted, conditions are only imposed to ensure that the defendant appears in court and that nothing is said or done to interfere with potential witnesses or the victim. Each case is judged on its individual merits, considering the nature and seriousness of the offence, the possible way it will be dealt with and the views of the Crown Prosecution Service, the police and the defendant or his solicitor.
Dr Dhami's opinion on consistency does not reflect what we actually do when we sit as a tribunal. Surveys such as this may get Dr Dhami an audience at the Psychological Society's conference, but will not secure co-operation from people such as myself in the future. Before commencing any study, Dr Dhami should observe the subjects or institutions in action; hopefully a more objective result would emerge.
DAVID WILDING JP
Bridge, Kent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments