Letter: Attacks on Fayed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I appear to be missing something. Can anyone please tell me why Mr Fayed is universally treated with the same opprobrium as a convicted paedophile?
He has been insulted regularly by the beneficiaries, direct and indirect, of his largess such as Neil Hamilton.
He has been execrated by such diverse enemies as Roy Jenkins and The Daily Mail. Private Eye devotes much of its fortnightly coverage to cheap jibes at him - even insulting him in the week he buried his son.
He has been refused a British passport by a succession of Home Secretaries of right and left.
It seems that the entire British media and political elites are united in detestation of him and therefore no quarter need be given in heaping ordure on his head.
Yet what is the case against him? He has no criminal convictions in this country. He has a contempt for corrupt and ungrateful politicians and he believes that some of them can be bought - views which many of us share.
He is rich and successful and he probably is, I have little doubt, a sharp and ruthless businessman. He has used his money to consolidate his position as the owner of Britain's most famous shop. He also owns a famous football club which he has improved at his own expense. He successfully defended himself against libel by buying the best legal skills available, which he is fully entitled to do. Yet he has never sued the many who have libelled him.
This is a pretty conclusive case. Why isn't he a member of the House of Lords?
CHRIS PAYNE
Uxbridge,
Middlesex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments