Letter: Another country

Richard Burge
Wednesday 24 March 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Terence Blacker correctly identifies "misunderstanding between urban and rural dwellers" (Comment, 17 March). However he paints a picture of confrontation that will benefit neither town nor country.

He condemns farmers for greed and environmental destruction. Yes, much harm has been done to our countryside by modern farming methods. Yet this was driven not by farmers but by national and European government, with half a century of subsidies and exhortation aimed at greater food production. That we still have one of the most conservation-rich countrysides in Europe says much for the many farmers who have resisted the destructive forces.

The vast majority of farmers are in the industry because they love the countryside. If they really were the "hard-eyed businessmen" to whom Terence Blacker refers, they would long ago have sold up and put their money in a building society. Farm incomes fell by 56 per cent last year yet farmers are struggling to remain in the vocation they love.

Mr Blacker asks whether the countryside should be treated as the farmer's factory floor or a leisure resource. It can perform both roles, but only if those who visit rural areas are sympathetic to the livelihoods and needs of those who live and work there.

RICHARD BURGE

Chief Executive

The Countryside Alliance

London, SE11

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in