Letter: ...and Woolsack

Jenny Rowe
Friday 16 October 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

...and Woolsack

Sir: Your article "Irvine tires of attire" (14 October) implies that the Lord Chancellor plans to cease wearing his traditional dress altogether and replace it with a lounge suit.

The proposals the Lord Chancellor made to the Lords' Procedure Committee were that: when he was acting as Speaker on the Woolsack, breeches, tights and buckled shoes would be replaced with black trousers and shoes; he would continue to wear Court dress: wig, gown, waistcoat and top coat. On important parliamentary occasions, he would continue to wear full ceremonial dress.

In order to adopt a more consistent approach when the Lord Chancellor acts as the Government's lead minister in the Lords (eg when promoting a Bill), he should be able to speak from the Front Bench with the advantage of the dispatch box on which to lay papers, and not have to wear his wig and gown. At present the Lord Chancellor does not wear wig and gown at Committee Stage, but does so on Second Reading, Report Stage and Third Reading. Adoption of this proposal would make it easier to distinguish between the different roles of Speaker and government minister in charge of a Bill.

JENNY ROWE

Private Secretary to the Lord Chancellor

House of Lords

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in