Letter: Allergic to GM soya
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I used to be a research scientist. I am concerned that scientists are over-revered, by governments and the public at large.
In the 1930s, scientists confidently assured us that asbestos was safe, and that there were no ill-effects from smoking tobacco. More recently, they assured us that BSE could not possibly affect humans. They were not lying. It was just that their experimental methods were flawed.
For centuries, it has been clear that scientists tend to relax when they have proof of what people want to hear. They are only human, and telling people nice things may further their career, or even get them a Nobel prize.
We need more healthy scepticism, and prime ministers pontificating about matters they don't understand won't help.
Dr JOHN CUTHBERT
Redbourn, Hertfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments