Leading Article: Special needs merit speedy justice
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SAM MANSELL, whose brain was damaged when he was starved of oxygen at birth, this week won more than pounds 3m for medical negligence. The out- of-court deal with his health authority, though welcome, came 11 years after his birth. Such delay is unacceptable.
Wheelchair-bound, Sam cannot speak, eat or control his limbs. He wears bandages to protect himself and needs full-time care. His mother described him as "in physical and emotional pain on a daily basis". That his mother had to battle for more than a decade to get proper assistance for him is an added tragedy.
As she explained, if Sam had received the therapies and equipment he needed from his earliest years, he would not be so disabled now. Instead, she was forced to divide her energy between his needs and fighting the state for help. For her troubles she was branded "unstable". Sadly, this is not a culture in which children's needs, or parents', are put first.
Unfortunately, Sam's case is not unusual. Many families, already going through the battle to bring up a disabled child, face the added burden of struggling for seven or eight years while claims for negligence plod through the courts. Meanwhile they must deal with a multitude of different education, health and social services agencies. Some end up fundraising privately. Others resort to so-called "dying lines", warning that care is so inadequate that their child could die.
This means, as ever, that those who shout loudest get the most help. Less assertive parents - perhaps single parents, or poor English-speakers - lose out.
Instead of this mess, all parents deserve two things. First, as efficient a legal process as possible in which defendants do not, as sometimes occurs, prolong cases in the hope that parents will drop out. Legal bills can exceed pounds 100,000. Second, they should get the day-to-day help they need. Already, education authorities are legally bound to meet disabled children's needs: that should also apply to health and social services. Then children might get the help they deserve.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments